![]() (2020) would precisely support this assumption, where they found no improvement in ankle stability, proprioception, and ankle evertors time latency following performing part two and the whole programme, respectively. Nonprogressive and static exercises may not stimulate control mechanisms of the postural system and therefore may not reduce the risk of lower extremity injuries. One possible explanation for this lack of efficacy could be the low volume of dynamic exercises in the first part, followed by extensive static exercises in the second part of the programme. Īlthough ankle injuries are among the most prevalent injuries in football, lower effects of the 11+ on such injuries have been observed. suggested that part two of the FIFA11+ can be used outside of the training sessions since the trainers do not want to invest in it. The most frequent reasons trainers gave for the modifications were adding variation, progression, challenge, and individualization. (2017) reported that the 11+ was only implemented in 12% of the training sessions, while the modified forms were implemented in 28% of the sessions. Although high compliance has shown a strong correlation with the success of the IPPs and team success, O’Brien et al. The latter, in addition to barriers such as prolonged duration, concerns regarding some exercises, and lack of a link to football-specific targets, has been discussed as a potential reason for low compliance and less application of the programme. However, the efficacy of the 11+ in the prevention of ankle and groin injuries and players’ performance has remained questionable. More specifically, in men’s subelite football, it reduces injury burden by up to 40%. The available literature strongly supports that the 11+ mitigates overall, thigh, and knee injuries among amature/subelite players. It aims to tackle the key elements of effective injury prevention programmes, such as neuromuscular control, static and dynamic balance, and the hamstring/quadriceps strength ratio. The 11+ consists of three parts with an overall duration of 25 minutes and three difficulty levels. Given the advantages it entails in preventing injuries, it has been widely investigated and named a well-established injury prevention programme (IPP). The FIFA 11+ programme (the 11+) was launched in 2006, aiming to integrate injury risk-mitigating exercises into a warm-up protocol. ![]() Hence, mitigating football-related injuries has turned into the main focus of scientific inquiries. Missing training with a consecutive reduction in performance, dropout of young talent, early retirement, high socioeconomic costs, and increased risk of osteoarthritis are known as the consequences of sustaining injury. įunding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.Ĭompeting interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.įootball accounts for nearly 300 million participants and is labeled the most popular but one of the riskiest Olympic sports. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.ĭata Availability: *** PA ACCEPT: Please follow up with authors for data availabile at Accept *** We note that your Data Availability Statement reads: "The dataset is uploaded on Kaggle, a public repository platform for placing data sets. ![]() ![]() Received: Accepted: SeptemPublished: October 20, 2022Ĭopyright: © 2022 Asgari et al. PLoS ONE 17(10):Įditor: Rafael Franco Soares Oliveira, Sport Sciences School of Rio Maior - Politechnic Institute of Santarem, PORTUGAL Citation: Asgari M, Alizadeh MH, Shahrbanian S, Nolte K, Jaitner T (2022) Effects of the FIFA 11+ and a modified warm-up programme on injury prevention and performance improvement among youth male football players.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |